Reporting Vietnam
Media and Military at War
William M. Hammond
376 pages, 60 photographs, 6 x 9
Modern War Studies
Cloth ISBN 978-0-7006-0911-6, $34.95 (t)
Paper ISBN 978-0-7006-0995-6, $19.95
WINNER OF THE RICHARD W. LEOPOLD PRIZE
For many Americans during the
Vietnam era, the war on the home front seemed nearly as wrenching
and hardfought as the one in Southeast Asia. Its primary battlefield
was the news media, its primary casualty the truth. But as William
Hammond reveals, animosity between government and media wasn't
always the rule; what happened between the two during the Vietnam
War was symptomatic of the nation's experiences in general. As
the "light at the end of the tunnel" dimmed, relations
between them grew ever darker.
Reporting Vietnam is an abridgement and updating of
Hammond's massive two-volume work issued by the Government Printing
Office. Based on classified and recently declassified government
documents-including Nixon's national security files-as well as
on extensive interviews and surveys of press war coverage, it
tells how government and media first shared a common vision of
American involvement in Vietnam. It then reveals how, as the
war dragged on, upbeat government press releases were consistently
challenged by journalists' reports from the field and finally
how, as public sentiment shifted against the war, Presidents
Johnson and Nixon each tried to manage the news media, sparking
a heated exchange of recriminations.
Hammond strongly challenges the assertions of many military
leaders that the media lost the war by swaying public opinion.
He takes readers through the twists and turns of official public
affairs policy as it tries to respond to a worsening domestic
political environment and recurring adverse "media episodes."
Along the way, he makes important observations about the penchant
of American officials for placing appearance ahead of substance
and about policy making in general.
Although Richard Nixon once said of the Vietnam war, "Our
worst enemy seems to be the press," Hammond clearly shows
that his real enemies were the contradictions and flawed assumptions
that he and LBJ had created. Reporting Vietnam brings
a critical study to a wider audience and is both a major contribution
to an ongoing debate and a cautionary guide for future conflicts.
"Few issues have aroused more controversy than the role
of the news media during the Vietnam War. Hammond demystifies
the subject in a book that is scrupulously researched, authoritative,
and, above all, readable."--Stanley Karnow, author
of Vietnam: A History
"By far the best study of the press and armed services
yet written."--Stephen E. Ambrose, author of Citizen
Soldiers
"Hammond succeeds in puncturing much of the mythology
about the media--and doing so in a readable and thorough fashion."--Washington
Post Book World
"Hammond depicts the tension between the armed services
and the media as a game of strategy, one-upmanship, and high-stakes
jockeying. Drawing on a thorough examination of military documents
and newspaper and broadcast reports, he explains how the press
allowed the military to bring back tear gas for use in the war,
how various news organizations contradicted themselves and one
another in describing the war's unfolding, and how much of the
American public came to feel that the war was a hopeless effort."--Publishers
Weekly
"Reporting Vietnam is a classic journalism history
and an essential work in helping understand America's most controversial
foreign conflict. It is not only the definitive account of Vietnam
war reporting, but also an engrossing read."--Peter Arnett,
CNN correspondent and author of Live from the Battlefield
WILLIAM M. HAMMOND is a senior historian with the U.S.
Army's Center of Military History and lecturer in university
honors at the University of Maryland.
|