Even the Children of Strangers
Equality under the U.S. Constitution
Donald W. Jackson
296 pages, 6 x 9
Paper ISBN 978-0-7006-0548-4, $14.95
In 1883 the Supreme Court upheld
a state law prohibiting intermarriages between blacks and whites.
The logic: punishment was the same for offenders of both races.
Ten years earlier, law-school graduate Myra Bradwell was denied
admission to the bar in Illinois. The reasoning: "Proper
timidity and delicacy evidently unfits [women] from many of the
occupations of civil life."
Although diverse cases, they shared a common bond. Both denied
equality yet both followed the 1868 ratification of the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In Even the Children of Strangers, Donald W. Jackson
unravels the complex meanings of equal protection doctrine and
its various interpretations over the last 134 years. Characterized
by anything but consensus, constitutional law and democratic
theory have been tested in the Supreme Court's evolving applications
of such landmark decisions as Plessy v. Ferguson ("separate
but equal"), Brown v. Board of Education, and the
Bakke case.
Jackson explores the conceptual basis for a variety of "pecking
orders" (or discriminations)--most notably race and sex,
but also wealth, occupation, and education--that have been used
to justify special privilege, status, or rewards. He also examines
the tensions between equal protection and American individualism.
After making a comparison between U.S. equal protection laws
with those in Canada and India and certain provisions of international
law, he offers possible ways to resolve apparently intractable
conflicts between individualism and affirmative action policies.
An assumption of human equality is always appropriate and
the burden of proof should always be on those who want to justify
treating people differently, for whatever reason, Jackson argues.
Our historic difficulty, he contends, has not been with the principle
of equality but with the inferior reasons we have accepted for
deviating from that principle.
"Human equality and its conceptual companions, human
brotherhood and sisterhood, often appear to us as 'strangers'
these days," Jackson writes. "The faces of 'strangers'
such as equality and brotherhood are usefully evocative, but
only when we bother to notice them."
Deliberately cast for the general reader, this study should
considerably widen the public understanding of equality and raise
the level of the debates that surround it.
"Made me proud of the struggle we as a people have waged
and continue to wage to bring definition and clarity to the issue
of equality. Donald Jackson is hopeful for the future. This is
a book that must be read by those who question or believe that
equality is a viable part of America's essence."--Barbara
Jordan, professor of ethics in politics at the Lyndon B.
Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin,
and former U.S. Representative
"Both graceful and solid, this book covers all the bases
for an initial study of equality in America. It combines analytic
philosophy with political history, comparative politics with
comparative case studies. Jackson is equally comfortable parsing
legal doctrines or recounting political battles. Most importantly,
he breaks through the usual debate between groups and individuals
with the sophisticated but simple concept of 'distance travelled.'
It is potentially of great use to policy makers as well as policy
analysts."--Jennifer L. Hochschild, author of What's
Fair: America's Beliefs about Distributive Justice and The
New American Dilemma: Liberal Democracy and School Desegregation
DONALD W. JACKSON is Herman Brown Professor of Political
Science at Texas Christian University and coeditor of the forthcoming
Comparative Judicial Review and Public Policy.
|