The Slaughterhouse Cases
Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment
Ronald M. Labbé and Jonathan Lurie
November 2003
328 pages, 12 illustrations, 6-1/8 x 9-1/4
Cloth ISBN 978-0-7006-1290-1, $34.95
WINNER OF THE SCRIBES AWARD
given by the American Society of Writers on Legal Subjects
The
Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, sought
to protect the rights of the newly freed slaves; but its first important
test did not arise until five years later. When it did, it centered
on a vitriolic dispute among the white butchers of mid-Reconstruction
New Orleans.
The rough-and-tumble world of nineteenth-century New Orleans was
a sanitation nightmare, with the citys slaughterhouses dumping
animal remains into neighboring backwaters. When Louisiana authorized
a monopoly slaughterhouse to bring about sanitation reform, many
butchers felt disenfranchised. Framing their case as an infringement
of rights protected by the new amendment, they flooded the lower
courts with nearly 300 suits. The surviving cases that reached the
U.S. Supreme Court pitted the butchers right-to-labor against
the states police power to regulate public health.
The result was a controversial decision that for the first time
addressed the meaning and import of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Speaking for the slim majority in the Courts 5-4 decision,
Justice Samuel F. Miller upheld the states actions as a fair
use of its police power. Of much greater import, however,
was Millers finding that the Fourteenth Amendment was intended
exclusively as a means of protecting and redressing the suffering
of former slaves. The result was a very restricted interpretation
of the privileges and immunities, due process,
and equal protection clauses of the new amendment. The
Court refused to allow the broad terms of a single amendment to
alter the existing balance of power between the states and the federal
government.
In striking contrast, the minority, led by Justice Stephen Field,
claimed that the Fourteenth Amendment had been intended to apply
to all Americans, not just former slaves. In particular, it guaranteed
the New Orleans butchers a right to equal treatment in the exercise
of the police power.
Engagingly written and insightfully argued, the book provides the
most complete analysis yet of this controversial Supreme Court decision,
fills a major gap in American history, law, and politics, and sets
the standard for all future discussions on the subject.
“Labbe and Lurie have painted, with graceful style, a magnificent panorama of a key episode of nineteenth-century legal history. . . . From their vivid description of the public health hazards afflicting nineteenth-century New Orleans to their superb chapter surveying the Supreme Court led by Chief Justice Chase, this is compellingly readable history.”—Journal of American History
“The authors have done a remarkable job unraveling the complex threads of this intriguing legal history.”—Louisiana History
An outstanding book, deeply researched and beautifully
written. The authors examine with great skill and care the social
and political background, and the legal implications, of one of
the pivotal cases of American constitutional history. In every
way this is a vivid, intriguing, illuminating case study: a model
for work of this kind.--Lawrence M. Friedman, author
of A History of American Law
Just about everyone who studies the Fourteenth Amendment
addresses the Slaughterhouse Cases, but this is the first book
to focus so completely on the case itself. . . . An excellent
book that fills a significant gap.--Paul Kens, author
of Lochner v. New York: Economic Regulation on Trial
A superb work that tells a lively and compelling story.--Herbert
Hovenkamp, author of Enterprise and American Law, 18361937
RONALD M. LABBÉ is professor emeritus of political
science at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette and has written
extensively on Louisiana law and politics. JONATHAN LURIE
is professor of history and adjunct professor of law at Rutgers
University and author of Military Justice in America, 17751980.
|