Rehnquist Justice Understanding the Court Dynamic Edited by Earl M. Maltz May 2003 352 pages, 6 x 9 Paper ISBN 978-0-7006-1244-4, $19.95 One of Choice Magazine's Outstanding Academic Titles for 2005 With seven of its justices appointed by Republican presidents, today’s Supreme Court has significantly altered America’s legal landscape since 1986 by tilting constitutional jurisprudence to the right. That was the goal of Presidents Reagan and Bush in filling court vacancies and has been felt in cases related to federalism, economic rights, and affirmative action. However, liberal issues such as abortion have moved only marginally to the right, while rulings by the Court on school prayer and gay rights have moved constitutional doctrine slightly to the left. Here prominent constitutional scholars are joined by new voices from the cutting edge of academia to show that the Rehnquist Court’s conservatism is less extreme than many have supposed. Reflecting views across the political spectrum, the contributors help readers understand the Court dynamic, its constrained conservatism, and the forces that shape constitutional law in general. As these authors show, the overall pattern of decision-making in the Rehnquist era cannot be attributed to any single, unified approach to constitutional analysis. Instead, it can only be understood as the product of a complex interaction among individual justices, each with an idiosyncratic view of the proper interpretation of the Constitution and the role of the Court in the American political system. These essays provide insight into this interaction by focusing on each member of the bench. From the staunch conservatism of Clarence Thomas, to the “accommodationism”of Sandra Day O’Connor, to the “liberal constitutionalism” of David Souter, the essays analyze the unique approach of each justice to interpreting the Constitution. They also show that the current justices are the product of a nomination and confirmation process that has undergone a major transformation—one which now favors experienced, often unknown jurists over high-profile public servants. By concentrating attention on its members, Rehnquist Justice allows us to better understand the Supreme Court as a whole. And by assessing today’s judiciary in light of a public philosophy that looks askance at government, it shows us that the Supreme Court has truly become a mirror of its times. “An essential volume for understanding the interactions and disagreements among the nine current members of the Rehnquist Court.”--John Anthony Maltese, author of The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees “Students of constitutional law and politics, as well as general readers interested in the Supreme Court, will find this collective portrait of ‘the Rehnquist Court’ insightful and rewarding.”--David O’Brien, author of Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics “A wonderful volume that will make great reading in constitutional law courses at almost any level.”--R. Shep Melnick, author of Regulation and the Courts “A provocative book that is must reading for students of constitutional politics.”--Tinsley E. Yarbrough, author of The Rehnquist Court and the Constitution EARL M. MALTZ is Distinguished Professor of Law at Rutgers University, Camden, and author of Rethinking Constitutional Law and Civil Rights, the Constitution, and Congress, 1863–1869, both from the University Press of Kansas, and most recently The Chief Justiceship of Warren Burger.   Home | About the Press | Recent Awards | Contact Us | Order New Books: | By Author | By Subject | By Title | By Series Books in Print: | By Author | By Subject | By Title | By Series ©2007 University Press of Kansas 2502 Westbrooke Circle, Lawrence, KS 66045-4444 Phone (785) 864-4155; Fax (785) 864-4586