Animal Sacrifice and Religious Freedom
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
David M. OBrien
March 2004
208 pages, 5-1/2 x 8-1/2
Landmark Law Cases and American Society
Cloth ISBN 978-0-7006-1302-1, $29.95
Paper ISBN 978-0-7006-1303-8, $12.95
The
Santeria religion of Cuba--the Way of the Saints--mixes West African
Yoruba culture with Catholicism. Similar to Haitian voodoo, Santeria
has long practiced animal sacrifice in certain rites. But when Cuban
immigrants brought those rituals to Florida, local authorities were
suddenly confronted with a controversial situation that pitted the
regulation of public health and morality against religious freedom.
After Ernesto Pichardo established a Santeria church in Hialeah
in the 1980s, the city of Hialeah responded by passing ordinances
banning ritual animal sacrifice. Although on the surface those ordinances
seemed general in intent, they were clearly aimed at Pichardos
church. When Pichardo subsequently sued the city, a federal court
ruled in the latters favor, in effect privileging the regulation
of public health and morality over the churchs free exercise
of its religion.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard Pichardos appeal in 1993 and
unanimously decided that the city had overstepped its bounds in
targeting this particular religious group; however, the court was
sharply divided regarding the basis of its decision. Three concurring
opinions registered distinctly different views of the First Amendment,
the limits of government regulation, and the religious freedom of
minorities. In the end, the nine justices collectively concluded
that freedom of religious belief was absolute while the freedom
to practice the tenets of any faith were subject to non-discriminatory
local regulations.
David OBrien, one of Americas foremost scholars of
the Court, now illuminates this controversy and its significance
for law, government, and religion in America. His lively account
takes us behind the scenes at every stage of the litigation to reveal
a riveting case with more twists and turns than a classic whodunit.
Ranging with equal ease from primitive magic to municipal politics
and to the most arcane points of constitutional law, OBrien
weaves a compelling and instructive tale with a fascinating array
of politicians, lawyers, jurists, civil libertarians, and animal
rights advocates. Offering sharp insights into the key issues and
personalities, he highlights cultural clashes large and small, while
maintaining a balance for both the needs of government and the religious
rights of individuals.
A fascinating tale told with OBriens signature
stylish flair and deep understanding of the legal issues central
to this case. Should appeal to anyone who loves a great story
and cares about the tug-of-war between government regulation and
religious freedom.--Nadine Strossen, President, American
Civil Liberties Union, and Professor of Law, New York Law School
A riveting, blow-by-blow account of one of the most interesting
religious freedom cases to be decided by the Supreme Court in
the twentieth century. The mix of unorthodox religious practice,
religious persecution, political intrigue, and pursuit of justice
make for a superb story that will fascinate general and expert
readers alike.--Derek Davis, author of Original
Intent: Chief Justice Rehnquist and the Course of American Church/State
Relations
OBrien is both a fine scholar and master storyteller
and his book is an important contribution to the understanding
of the dynamics of minority religion in America. He has a sharp
eye for colorful characters as well as legal principle, and he
guides us easily through the tangled immigrant politics of South
Florida, the history of American law concerning religious freedom,
and the exchanges among litigants, amici, attorneys, and judges
on the road to decision.--Joseph M. Murphy, author
of Santeria: African Spirits in America
DAVID M. O'BRIEN is Leone Reaves and George W. Spicer Professor
at the University of Virginia. His other books include Storm
Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics, now in its sixth
edition, and a two-volume casebook, Constitutional Law and Politics,
now in its fifth edition.
|