To Run a Constitution
The Legitimacy of the Administrative State
John A. Rohr
xvi, 272 pages, 6 x 9
Studies in Government and Public Policy
Paper ISBN 978-0-7006-0301-5, $14.95
In 1887, the centennial year of
the American Constitution, Woodrow Wilson wrote that "it
is getting to be harder to run a constitution than to
frame one." The context for Wilson's comment was an essay
calling for sound principles of administration that would enable
government officials to "run" a constitution well.
Wilson and his fellow civil-service reformers had a profound
influence on the development of American administrative institutions.
Unfortunately, the reformers paid more attention to the exigencies
of running a constitution than to the Constitution itself. They
and their intellectual progeny developed a theory of administration
that was at odds with the theory of the Constitution. As a result,
we find ourselves living today in what we often call an "administrative
state"--a state seemingly bereft of legitimating principles
grounded in the political thought of the framers of the Constitution.
In To Run a Constitution, John A. Rohr takes seriously
two basic premises: de Tocqueville's belief that citizens are
corrupted by obeying powers they believe to be illegitimate,
and the view that, despite present political sentiment, the administrative
state is here to stay. The book focuses on the important question
of whether the administrative state, an abiding presence in American
politics, can be justified in terms of the American constitutional
tradition.
In addressing this question, Rohr goes beyond considerations
of case law to examine the principles of the Constitution both
at its founding and in its subsequent development. Relying on
the normative character of political "foundings," Rohr
analyzes three significant founding periods: 1) the founding
of the Republic, 1787-1795; 2) the founding of public administration,
1883-1899; and 3) the founding of the administrative state, 1933-1941.
He judges the last two foundings by the first in developing his
argument that the modern administrative state can be justified
in terms of the kind of government the framers of the Constitution
envisaged.
On the eve of the bicentennial of the Constitution, Rohr's
argument advances a new, normative theory of public administration
that is intended to "support and defend the Constitution
of the United States," in accordance with the oath of office
taken by public administrators. It is critical reading for scholars
in the fields of public administration, political science, and
constitutional studies.
"Building upon the avowal that 'there is need for a normative
theory of public administration that is grounded in the Constitution,'
Rohr derives and delineates with meticulous regard for constitutional
text and historical context the founding and development of the
administrative state in word and deed. Conscientiousness, candor,
and conscience pervade his incisive analyses, cogent arguments,
and enticing urbane chatting with the reader in this landmark
study of Constitutional legitimacy"--Victor Rosenblum,
coauthor of Constitutional Law: Political Roles of the Supreme
Court
"A forcefully argued point of view . . . certain to engage
the field in constructive argumentation over fundamental issues
ranging from constitutional foundations . . . to the current
meaning and force of the public administrator's oath to uphold
the Constitution."--Chester A. Newland, Editor-in-Chief,
Public Administration Review
"In a complex argument that combines boldness with impressive
scholarship, Rohr seeks to legitimize the administrative state
in history, law, and 'principles.' This is a major addition to
the literature of public administration, and henceforth all who
would be knowledgeable in that area will need to have an informed
opinion on the positions it takes."--Dwight Waldo,
author of The Administrative State
"This is a broad, sweeping, synthesizing account that
rests on a firm grasp of constitutional history and principle."--Herman
Belz, coauthor of The American Constitution: Its Origin
and Development
"A very important book that should be required reading
for all public administrators in the United States. . . . The
scholarship is the strongest of any book published in public
administration in a decade or more. It will be a classic."--David
H. Rosenbloom, author of Public Administration and Law
JOHN A. ROHR is professor of public administration
at the Center for Public Administration and Policy at Virginia
Polytechnic Institute. A recipient of the ASPA Distinguished
Research Award, he is the author of six other books, including
Public Service, Ethics, and Constitutional
Practice, Founding Republics
in France and America: A Study in Constitutional Governance,
and Civil Servants and Their Constitutions.
|