Campus Hate Speech on Trial
Timothy C. Shiell
216 pages, 6 x 9
Cloth ISBN 978-0-7006-0889-8, $29.95
Paper ISBN 978-0-7006-0997-0, $15.95
"The campus has no need for
policement of prejudice," political scientist Martin Gruberg
has observed. "Universities should confront offensive ideas
by rebuttal, not by suppression."
Despite commitments to free speech and the open exchange of
ideas, American colleges and universities have increasingly ignored
such recommendations by implementing numerous hate speech codes
designed to protect students from racial, sexual, and other forms
of harassment. Taking their cue from Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act, which guarantees the right to a nonhostile workplace environment,
these regulations have posed seemingly unresolvable conflicts
between the ideals of free speech and equal protection.
In the first book-length analysis of this issue, Timothy Shiell
offers an evenhanded review of the codes and of the litigation
that has arisen from them. He explores both sides of the fiery
debate over campus hate speech to bring out its philosophical
and legal underpinnings, clarifying classic free speech arguments
as well as the ideas of harm and hostile environment. He also
presents numerous case histories that demonstrate the perplexing
nature of the dilemma for jurists.
Shiell shows how campus speech codes have tended to be overbroad,
arbitrarily enforced, and often used selectively to protect only
certain groups. In pointing out that Title VII wasn't meant to
apply to academia, he asks readers to consider the lengths to
which courts should go in eliminating prejudice in this setting
and presents a strong argument for the form these codes should
ideally take.
This important book makes it clear that any policy, no matter
how well grounded in history, law, or philosophy, will leave
something to be desired, and concludes that the value of free
speech must be upheld even in support of hatred. As the first
systematic analysis of campus hate speech and Title VII, Campus
Hate Speech on Trial challenges academics and general readers
alike to reconsider how we deal with this important issue.
"The debate over speech codes for colleges and universities
centers on two conflicting goals: the need to insure free speech
and the desire to limit racist, sexist, and similar speech to
insure equal educational opportunities. Shiell presents a detailed
analysis of the historical, legal, and philosophical arguments
for both sides. This well-written work stands as required reading
for anyone interested in the debate."--Library Journal
"A fair-minded and significant contribution to the study
of an important public issue. This book will be useful in a wide
range of disciplines, including law, political science, philosophy,
race and ethnic studies, American studies, and communications."--Andrew
Altman, author of Arguing about Law and Critical Legal
Studies
"A worthwhile read for anyone in an academic institution.
Campus Hate Speech on Trial will appeal as a classroom
text and will provide faculty and administrators with analysis
in an area where rhetoric is too often the norm."--Law
& Politics Book Review
"Will be of interest to all those concerned with free
speech issues."--Choice
TIMOTHY C. SHIELL is associate professor of philosophy
at the University of Wisconsin-Stout and editor of the volume
Legal Philosophy: Selected Readings.
|