Over Lincoln's Shoulder
The Committee on the Conduct of the War
Bruce Tap
368 pages, 8-12 photographs, 6 x 9
Modern War Studies
Paper ISBN 978-0-7006-1426-4, $19.95
Shortly after the beginning of
the Civil War, Congress established the Joint Committee on the
Conduct of the War to investigate such matters as military contracts,
trade with the enemy, treatment of the wounded, and the causes
of Union defeat. But its greatest efforts were directed toward
a more vigorous war effort--endorsing emancipation, the use of
black soldiers, and the appointment of fighting generals--leading
President Lincoln to fear that this watchdog committee would
become little more than an "engine of agitation."
The Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War generated controversy
throughout the war, and its legacy sparks debate even today over
whether it invigorated or hampered the Union war effort. In the
wake of both critical and sympathetic appraisals, Bruce Tap now
offers the first history of the committee's activities, focusing
on the nature of its power and influence on military policy in
order to show conclusively what the ultimate impact really was.
Tap presents solid evidence, including examples of contact
between Congress and the military, to show that the committee
produced little good and no small amount of harm. The committee's
principal members entertained simplistic notions about warfare
that led to rash judgments about its conduct, and because its
goals were congruent with Republican ideology, its principal
criterion in evaluating military leadership was adherence to
antislavery beliefs. As a result, the Joint Committee on the
Conduct of the War polarized Congress and the army, limited strategic
options, demoralized the Union's top generals, and inflated the
reputations of incompetent soldiers. As Tap demonstrates, it
was in many ways a serious impediment to the war effort, due
not to its fanaticism or vindictiveness, as some historians have
suggested, but rather to its members' total ignorance of military
matters.
Over Lincoln's Shoulder is a revisionist account that
corrects prevailing images of the relationship between Republican
politicians and the army during the Civil War. By examining the
conflict between Congress's constitutional right to investigate
and the impropriety of its actions, the book raises questions
that are applicable today about the ability of legislative bodies
to function in areas where specialized knowledge is required.
"Tap's case is one worth making. He argues that the Joint
Committee on the Conduct of the War produced little good and
some harm, polarizing politicians against professional soldiers,
limiting strategic options, and inflating the reputations of
military incompetents. These errors, he shows, stemmed from ignorance
of military art and from partisanship. Although his conclusions
will raise some eyebrows, he provides good evidence for his case.
A solid and readable old-fashioned political history, this book
will correct our image of the relationship between Republicans
and the army in the Civil War."--Mark E. Neely, Jr.,
author of The Last Best Hope of Earth
"This book fills a major gap in the study of the Civil
War and does so in a way that is authoritative and probably definitive.
It will achieve a permanent place in Civil War scholarship."--Albert
Castel, author of Decision in the West
BRUCE TAP is an independent historian who resides in
Grand Rapids, Michigan. He holds a Ph.D. from the University
of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign and has published articles
in Civil War History and other journals.
|